Skip to main content

Feed

Connect with fellow Trailblazers. Ask and answer questions to build your skills and network.

In customize a Salesforce object module , create validation rules getting error . 

Please resolve my problem as soon as possible. Any one help and do my task sir /madam. 

In customize a Salesforce object module , create validation rules getting error

 

 

 

#Trailhead Challenges

1 answer
  1. Today, 5:14 AM

    Hi , 

     

    Try unchecking the checkbox "deselect the checkbox Restrict picklist to the values ​​defined in the value set" in Picklist (Multi-Select) Options in the settings for "Close Reason". 

     

     

    Hi , Try unchecking the checkbox

     

     

0/9000
1 answer
0/9000

Hi Trailblazers,

I’m currently working on the "Connect Data Cloud to Agentforce and Prompt Builder" Trailhead module, specifically the “Bring External Data into the Contact Page Layout” unit. While creating an Identity Resolution Ruleset, I’m getting the following error:

Here's what I’ve already done:

  • ✅ Created and deployed 3 data streams:
    • External_Guest__c_Home
    • External_Reservation__c_Home
    • Contact_Home
  • ✅ Mapped the fields in External_Guest__c_Home to:
    • Individual → First Name, Surname, Birthdate, Record ID
    • Contact Point Email → Email
    • Contact Point Phone → Phone Number
  • ✅ Mapped Contact_Home fields to:
    • Individual → First Name, Last Name, Salutation, Title, Birthdate, Contact ID
    • Contact Point Email → Email
    • Contact Point Phone → Mobile, Business, Assistant Phones
    • Contact Point Address → Mailing Street, City, State, Country, Zip
  • ✅ Mapped External_Reservation__c_Home fields to:
    • ExternalReservation DMO → Check-in Date, Check-out Date, Room Type, Reservation Status, Record ID, and Contact ID → Individual ID
  • ✅ All data streams show Last Run Status: Success and Total Records > 0
  • ✅ Tried re-saving, re-deploying, and refreshing mappings
  • ❌ Still getting the same error while setting up the identity resolution ruleset (Primary DMO: Individual)

I've reviewed all mappings and ensured I'm only using standard Cloud Information Model DMOs (no custom ones).

Is there anything I might be missing? Could this be a caching issue or a problem with the mapping not being saved correctly under the hood?   

1 answer
0/9000

Hello Community, 

 

I just have a query while working on superbadge. I need to create every time a developer edition Org or with one stable org we can pass all superbadge challenges? 

 

#Trailhead

2 answers
  1. Ajaypreet Singh Saini (Grantbook) Forum Ambassador
    Today, 4:42 AM

    Hey @Aqub Younus, each superbadge org has unique pre-configured data and metadata needed for that specific superbadge unit. So, 1 org can't be used for all superbadges. Each superbadge unit has the special superbadge org signup link available in the scenario text.

0/9000
2 answers
  1. Ajaypreet Singh Saini (Grantbook) Forum Ambassador
    Today, 4:47 AM

    Hey @Nandini Devi Rachapalli, make sure you are using an Einstein org and not a normal trailhead playground org. Also, make sure the Einstein setting is turned on for your org first. 

     

    Follow these steps: 

    1. From Setup, in the Quick Find box, enter Einstein Setup, and then select Einstein Setup. 

    2. Enable Turn on Einstein and refresh the page.

0/9000

We have a consultant salesperson who is going to be providing Leads that (hopefully) will get converted to Contacts and Opportunities.  We need to be able to monitor this persons activities without letting them have access to our org.  I have proposed:

  • Giving another user delegated administration to the consultant so they can log in as that person and do their work.
  • Allow another user to do the consultants work and simply assign the records to the consultant as the owner.
  • Create different a Role and Profile for the consultant and limit their ability to view records they do not own.

 

Can anyone think of a fourth option that I've not thought of? 

Thanks

3 answers
  1. Today, 4:35 AM

    I agree with your take—setting up a separate Role and Profile for the consultant is the cleaner and safer route. That way, you maintain clear visibility into their actions through the audit trail, and you avoid the messy confusion that comes from shared logins or using "Login As" without proper documentation. 

    It also reinforces accountability. If something breaks or changes unexpectedly, you know exactly who made the change and under what access level. Giving them limited access based on the principle of least privilege is always a good practice, especially when dealing with external consultants. 

0/9000

Hello Community, 

 

I am working on this module eventhough I followed every steps still I am getting stucked at this challenge 

 

"Challenge Not yet complete... here's what's wrong:

We can't find the expected relationships for Track List".

 

 

 

 

#Trailhead Challenges

3 answers
0/9000

 I get this message in challenge 1: 

Challenge Not yet complete... here's what's wrong: 

The Agentforce Data Library setup is missing the required Code of Conduct PDF configuration. Please allow sufficient time for the configuration to complete. 

 

Ihave an active connection  

I do have the PDF in the data library: 

 

Agentforce for Service Superbadge Unit

 

 

 

#Trailhead Challenges  #Agentforce  #Trailhead Superbadges

4 answers
  1. Today, 4:09 AM

    I am facing the same issue, infact the org is updated and I could see the data library is on ready status with the file uploaded. 

    I am facing the same issue, infact the org is updated and I could see the data library is on ready status with the file uploaded. Did any face issue like this?

     

     

    2.png

     

     

    Did any face issue like this? 

     

     

     

0/9000

I'm getting frustrated with this challenge. I took note of starting a new playground for this module "Data Modeling" and not sure what steps I missed to create the customer field on 'Offer Object'. 

  • Create a custom Master-Detail field on the Offer object
    • Data Type: Master-Detail
    • Related To: Property
    • Field Label: Property
    • Field Name: Property

I'm getting this error when I try to create the custom field. Any suggestions on why I can't create this in the Offer object, would be much appreciated.  

 

stuck on

 

 

 

#Trailhead Challenges

6 answers
  1. Yesterday, 5:45 AM

    HI @Neitana Leung Choi

    You can delete all offer records first and then try.

    So basically the error says is this

    If you have existing offer records, you cannot create a master-detail to Property object.

    This is because in a master-detail relation you can't create offer records without having property record mapped to the offer.  

    Thanks!

0/9000

I created the wrong type of prompt for the first challenge.  When I verified the challenge it indicated that if I used the wrong type of prompt,  I had to save it as a "new template".  The issue is saving it as a "new template" still does not allow me to reuse the name given on the "field generation" prompt.  I have already completed the new correct type of prompt, but when I tried to name it as instructed, I could not save it because the API name has been utilized. 

 

Is there a way to delete or modify the API name? 

 

Any help would be appreciated. 

 

Thanks, 

 

#Trailhead Challenges  #Trailhead Superbadges

3 answers
  1. Today, 3:47 AM

    I had to delete the flow and the flow interviews. After I deleted both flow interviews, the version 1 flow was deleted then I could delete the incorrect prompt template and finish the first challenge. 

     

    Thanks to all.

0/9000