Feed

Hello Dears,

I found that NPSP is an open source and I have daily errors send to me by email and I trying to Enable Debug from "Error Setting" but not get any further details because the Batch running is (hidden), so I am asking about a way to deploy the NPSP as unmanaged package and have access to all classes to debug my error more efficient way.

Thanks a lot.

Having spoken with SFDC Support I've realised that my email-to-case responding wasn't working because the routing address outbound details you need to sign in to the account you want to send responses from, but with a shared mailbox it doesn't have a login. 

I'm surprised there isn't an easily available workaround because it seems it would always be a shared mailbox that someone would initially be emailing in order to create the case. 

Has anyone found a solution to this? 

Hi NPSP Community,

We're running into a reporting challenge with our 7+ year NPSP setup and getting conflicting advice about whether it's a foundational architecture issue or something simpler.

Our Setup:

• Nonprofit Cloud with Program Management Module
• All users currently have System Admin profiles (we know this isn't best practice)
• Using Service Delivery objects linked to Contacts

The Problem: We can see Contact names in the "Client" field on Service Delivery records, but when building reports that need to join Contact and Service Delivery data, the Contact ID field doesn't appear as an available option in the report builder. This forces us to use "joined reports" which are clunky.

The Question: A consultant is telling us this is because our foundational object relationships are broken and we need to rebuild our role hierarchy and profiles before any reporting will work properly. But since we're using standard NPSP objects, shouldn't these relationships work out of the box?

Specific Questions:

1. Should Contact ID be visible in Service Delivery reports in a standard NPSP setup?
2. Could the System Admin profiles actually be preventing us from seeing these relationship fields?
3. Or is this more likely a report building technique issue that can be solved without major architectural changes?

Has anyone encountered similar reporting challenges in NPSP? Any guidance on whether this is truly a "rebuild the foundation" situation or something that can be fixed more directly?

Send me on this email "poojamulay52 #Beginner Level Adminstrator  #Voucher For Admin N Devloper  #Saleforce Administrator

Hello, Trailblazers! 

I did stumble on the very first challenge of Agentforce for the Service Superbadge Unit. 

Error says: 

Challenge Not yet complete... here's what's wrong: 

The Agentforce Data Library setup is missing the required Code of Conduct PDF configuration. Please allow sufficient time for the configuration to complete. 

• I uploaded the file and waited around 30 minutes. The status in Agentforce Data Library is 'ready'.
• I uploaded the same file and waited several times
• I created a totally new org and repeated all actions once again

The error is the same. I want to complete 'Become an Agentblazer Innovator', but I just can't because validation doesn't work properly, or there is some other problem 

Please advise, it's getting on my nerves...

This is what appears to me as Step 1, so i can't edit the record page...  

When I try to access Agentforce Sales Coach at the Salesforce Go, it doesnt work also... 

Its the second time im trying to do it, because its the last step to my Agentblazer Innovation Badge, but somehow this lab seems to be broken 

I created a modifiable picklist field on the Account layout. It’s a simple field, not linked to any validation rule or flow, and it's not a formula field. I checked the field settings, and it's editable by everyone.

Why can't I edit it in a report? I get this error message: "The page layout for this record doesn’t allow edits."

How can I make this field editable directly from a report? 

Hi everyone, 

 I submitted a support request on

I’m hoping to take the exam later this year, once the new Pearson VUE system launches. I asked if my voucher could be transferred or extended, but I haven’t received any response yet, and I’m really worried it might go to waste.

Has anyone else experienced this? And if any Salesforce moderators or team members are reading this, could you please assist or escalate my case?

Thanks in advance for any guidance.

– Kelly Hamisi

Webassessor Username:

Region: EMEA 

Hi all, 

I'm working on the Agentblazer Champion project, and as part of the 

Connect Data Cloud to Agentforce and Prompt Builder - Bring External Data into the Contact Page Layout step, I'm being asked to set up an Identity Resolution.  

I've followed all the steps until that point, including setting up the Data Stream (which I was able to successfully run with the correct amount of records on only after selecting the Refresh Now option for each one), shown here.

The next step, 

Set Up Identity Resolution, directs me to create a New Ruleset, keeping the Data Space as default and selecting Individual as the Primary Data Model Object. This is where I'm blocked, as there is both an error message on this modal, "Mappings from Data Streams to the standard Cloud Information Model objects such as Individual and Contact Points are required."

, and no options appear when I try to click Select a primary DMO, shown here. 

I got curious and navigated to the Data Model tab to investigate the object, and found that all but one of the objects are in the Processing status, which I assume is why they're not ready to be selected, shown here. 

At the time of posting this, I've given it at least an hour to process, but it feels like it shouldn't be taking this long, especially with so few records and fields mapped.  

Any help would be appreciated! 

#Trailhead Challenges

While setting up Identity Resolution, I'm not able to select Primary DMO its showing an issue stating that "Mapping from Data Streams to the standard Cloud Information Model objects such as individual and contact points are required."  

#Trailhead Challenges